Thursday, 11 December 2014

What's Wrong With This Picture? Pub Toilet of the Year, The Horseshoes, Newmarket.

Regular readers of this blog (both of you) will know that I'm prone to flights of fancy and diversion from the subject of beer from time to time. In fact, over the past year this blog has sort of gone to rack and ruin, partly by virtue of me having nothing interesting left to say, and partly by me having less and less free time.

However, this moved me to write on so many levels. On one hand, the picture of the toilets in The Horseshoes, Newmarket, sent me into such a rage that I nearly didn't know where to start. I'd concede that the urinals might just about be classed as kitsch, some sort of Dutch (sorry Holland) pop art version of an Ernie Cefalu piece filtered through the banal postmodernism of Jeff Koons' mind - but only just. Your mileage may vary on that, and I can understand why.

However, what is that that thing in front of the sink? A pair of spread-legged female buttocks? Where to start with that. Not only did some 21st century grown-up designer conceive of this as being a good idea, but equally, someone saw it in a catalogue and thought "yeah, the big lip urinals are OK, but the splayed female buttocks are really going to give this refurb the edge." Yes, it's edgy, as in edgy and uncomfortable.

And then there's the text. First of all, the use of the word "strident" to describe any female colleague who has had the temerity to raise an objection to this cultural Chernobyl. Why is it that any woman with an opinion is referred to as "strident"? Oh yeah, it's because men hate a dissenting female voice. Why not go the whole hog and say "shrill", or "annoying"?

And what about "it's in the gents so they shouldn't see it anyway"? Yes, that's right, this is what men want in their toilets - some time spent away from the strident opinions of women, urinating into open mouths (I still think they are Dutch kitsch (sorry Holland)), before a quick handwash while bumping and grinding against a presented pair of female fiberglass buttocks (I wonder if they have a heater in them to make them more inviting?). Err, no, it's not OK to have this in the gents, away from the prying eyes and strident opinions of women because you know what? Not only is this offensive to women, it's also offensive to men. That bent-over fiberglass arse, placed for a comedy grind while you wash you hands (maybe it's to try and encourage men to wash their hands?) debases us all as human beings. It's not going to bring a smile to my face this Christmas, and I don't want to be friends with anyone who thinks it's funny.

In short, this whole thing is a fucking disgrace. The toilets are a disgrace, the article is a disgrace, the misogyny is a disgrace, and I think we all deserve better.

Link to original article


12 comments:

  1. Look pretty clean though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not really - either a leak or a criminal amount of splashback around the urinals.

      Delete
    2. Judging by that photo the soil pipe from the urinals is clogged up so when the cistern empties water isn't draining fast enough so is cascading over the front of the bowl onto the floor. It's a problem that's only going to get worse. You'd think they'd have made sure the floor wasn't so wet before letting the photographer take the photo.

      Delete
  2. Spot on there Sir, just an unacceptable abomination of a design.The bum-thing in front of the sink is particularly disturbingly creepy. Also the tone of the article is pitifully appalling too.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gross and offensive at every level. Hate to think what the rest of the pub is like, as well.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Truly, truly horrible. Whoever thought this was ever a good idea?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ugh! Dispiriting and degrading.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think the time for twitter/blog/facebook outrage is over. It's time for direct action.

    I say we all go over there after eating a packet of out of date scotch eggs, drink a skin full and make a dirty protest.

    Who's with me?

    ReplyDelete
  7. It's a long way fo me Cookie, but you go for it. Incidentally, don't video your antics, for that would be illegal.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Is that a pub for men on a police register? Sick

    ReplyDelete

Sorry about the word verification - the blog was getting spammed to bits.